As I understand, Fedora 22 comes with MariaDB 10.0, so I actually hope we won't provide 10.0 packages for it, only 10.1, which is why I've set 'Fix version' to 10.1 only. But since we don't seem to have a policy for this, I'm assigning it to Sergei Golubchik for the decision.
Daniel Bartholomew, either we decide to provide 10.1 only, or also 10.0, we'll need a Fedora 22 VM. And we need to hurry, as Fedora 23 is already coming.
Elena Stepanova
added a comment - As I understand, Fedora 22 comes with MariaDB 10.0, so I actually hope we won't provide 10.0 packages for it, only 10.1, which is why I've set 'Fix version' to 10.1 only. But since we don't seem to have a policy for this, I'm assigning it to Sergei Golubchik for the decision.
Daniel Bartholomew , either we decide to provide 10.1 only, or also 10.0, we'll need a Fedora 22 VM. And we need to hurry, as Fedora 23 is already coming.
Elena Stepanova
added a comment - Daniel Bartholomew ,
I'm afraid we need this by GA.
Fedora 20 can be turned off, it's EOL-ed. Instead, we should have Fedora 22 and start preparing to Fedora 23 which is expected in less than a month.
As I understand, Fedora 22 comes with MariaDB 10.0, so I actually hope we won't provide 10.0 packages for it, only 10.1, which is why I've set 'Fix version' to 10.1 only. But since we don't seem to have a policy for this, I'm assigning it to Sergei Golubchik for the decision.
Daniel Bartholomew, either we decide to provide 10.1 only, or also 10.0, we'll need a Fedora 22 VM. And we need to hurry, as Fedora 23 is already coming.