Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Fix Version/s: 10.1.4
-
Component/s: Replication
-
Labels:
Description
From MDEV-6457 was a suggestion for a status variable to report slave_skipped_errors.
Wasn't sure if I needed a mutex around this to account for potential parallel replication error faults occurring at the same time (probably yes).
attached patch against 10.0.15-trunk
Gliffy Diagrams
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
MDEV-6457 feature request - preserve slave_skip_errors binlog events to own binlog
-
- Open
-
Activity
- All
- Comments
- Work Log
- History
- Activity
- Transitions
> Wasn't sure if I needed a mutex around this to account for potential
> parallel replication error faults occurring at the same time (probably yes).
Yes, you will need a mutex when setting and reading. Or you can use an atomic
increment and corresponding atomic read.
It's not just for parallel replication, also for multi-source.