Uploaded image for project: 'MariaDB Server'
  1. MariaDB Server
  2. MDEV-520

consider parallel replication patch from taobao patches

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Fix Version/s: 10.2
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:

      Gliffy Diagrams

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment -

          I wrote up my comments on the patch/project:

          https://lists.launchpad.net/maria-developers/msg04911.html

          Show
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment - I wrote up my comments on the patch/project: https://lists.launchpad.net/maria-developers/msg04911.html
          Hide
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment -

          Working with the author to review and work on the patch with the goal of eventual inclusion in MariaDB.

          Show
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment - Working with the author to review and work on the patch with the goal of eventual inclusion in MariaDB.
          Hide
          dingqi.lxb Xiaobin Lin added a comment -

          Hi, Kristian

          I see the work log in Jira, good news!

          Which bzr branch are you working on?
          bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dingqi-lxb/maria/parallel-replication/
          or somewhere else?

          Thank you !
          xiaobin

          Show
          dingqi.lxb Xiaobin Lin added a comment - Hi, Kristian I see the work log in Jira, good news! Which bzr branch are you working on? bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dingqi-lxb/maria/parallel-replication/ or somewhere else? Thank you ! xiaobin
          Hide
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment -

          This would be particularly interesting to revisit, now that there is a
          framework for parallel replication in 10.0.

          There is a framework for queueing up events for worker threads to
          apply in parallel, and for specifying that certain transactions need
          to wait for certain other transactions before starting or committing.
          It would be nice to see if the taobao patches can be easily
          fitted into this framework.

          Show
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment - This would be particularly interesting to revisit, now that there is a framework for parallel replication in 10.0. There is a framework for queueing up events for worker threads to apply in parallel, and for specifying that certain transactions need to wait for certain other transactions before starting or committing. It would be nice to see if the taobao patches can be easily fitted into this framework.
          Hide
          dingqi.lxb Xiaobin Lin added a comment -

          hi , Kristian,
             Which branch has the framework for parallel replication you mentioned in the JIRA?   I will check out it and check whether my patch can fit into it.Best Regards,Xiaobin Lin

          ------------------------------------------------------------------
          发件人:Kristian Nielsen (JIRA) <jira@mariadb.atlassian.net>
          发送时间:2013年11月22日(星期五) 20:41
          收件人:林晓斌(丁奇) <dingqi.lxb@taobao.com>
          主 题:[JIRA] (MDEV-520) consider parallel replication patch from taobao patches

          [ https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=36502#comment-36502 ]

          Kristian Nielsen commented on MDEV-520:
          ---------------------------------------

          This would be particularly interesting to revisit, now that there is a
          framework for parallel replication in 10.0.

          There is a framework for queueing up events for worker threads to
          apply in parallel, and for specifying that certain transactions need
          to wait for certain other transactions before starting or committing.
          It would be nice to see if the taobao patches can be easily
          fitted into this framework.


          This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
          (v6.2-OD-03#6206)

          Show
          dingqi.lxb Xiaobin Lin added a comment - hi , Kristian,    Which branch has the framework for parallel replication you mentioned in the JIRA?   I will check out it and check whether my patch can fit into it.Best Regards,Xiaobin Lin ------------------------------------------------------------------ 发件人:Kristian Nielsen (JIRA) <jira@mariadb.atlassian.net> 发送时间:2013年11月22日(星期五) 20:41 收件人:林晓斌(丁奇) <dingqi.lxb@taobao.com> 主 题: [JIRA] ( MDEV-520 ) consider parallel replication patch from taobao patches [ https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=36502#comment-36502 ] Kristian Nielsen commented on MDEV-520 : --------------------------------------- This would be particularly interesting to revisit, now that there is a framework for parallel replication in 10.0. There is a framework for queueing up events for worker threads to apply in parallel, and for specifying that certain transactions need to wait for certain other transactions before starting or committing. It would be nice to see if the taobao patches can be easily fitted into this framework. – This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2-OD-03#6206)
          Hide
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment -

          It is in 10.0 (lp:maria/10.0)

          Show
          knielsen Kristian Nielsen added a comment - It is in 10.0 (lp:maria/10.0)
          Hide
          danblack Daniel Black added a comment -

          given the parallel replication implementation in 10.0 can this bug be closed now?

          Show
          danblack Daniel Black added a comment - given the parallel replication implementation in 10.0 can this bug be closed now?

            People

            • Assignee:
              knielsen Kristian Nielsen
              Reporter:
              serg Sergei Golubchik
            • Votes:
              2 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 4 weeks Original Estimate - 4 weeks
                4w
                Remaining:
                Time Spent - 1 week, 4 days, 4 hours, 45 minutes Remaining Estimate - 4 weeks
                4w
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 1 week, 4 days, 4 hours, 45 minutes Remaining Estimate - 4 weeks
                1w 4d 4h 45m